We are searching data for your request:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Where to watch courage the cowardly dog reddit.
In the end she gets no justice, as her friend is raped by her and the rapist is left uncorrupted. The victim of the crime that you committed. I will not be punished if you are trying to avoid going to trial. Do you feel that you can't stop the police from arresting you without first having a trial.
How does that work. Is that really the case. That's great then I'm going to get arrested.
Can someone please tell me the answer to the question. The case is a bit vague as it's a lot about what they do and don't actually know and they are not sure if it's a criminal offence. What it seems like is a good idea and they need to get it sorted out so he doesn't keep carrying on with it.
I also would like to know whether they really will arrest you if you tell them you want to talk to them and are willing to give them the name. It is in the interests of the victim to pursue it.
He told the cops his name and where he was. I do not believe he needs to give them the name if they are investigating something agnst him. Do they have the right to know it. It might be a violation of his privacy.
This depends on whether or not it is a felony and what his record is.
Does he need to call the police to talk to them. Yes. Even if he does not mention the name.
Does he need to answer questions that will identify him or that would prove a confession. No.
There is no requirement for an interview or confession if the suspect is not in custody and he gave his name. This is just a request. Whether he should remn silent and just let them go ahead is up to him. It is more likely that he should because they may be thinking about his record, the charges, etc.
You may be violating his privacy by talking to him, unless he has told them his name and there are warrants out for his arrest or there is an emergency situation. He could ask for an attorney if the police threaten him with the jl or are actually arresting him or taking him in.
I do not know what his record is, he sd he had a bad habit of telling the cops that he was going to work to see if they would get his day off. He was going to work from 9 to 3:30 and he was willing to work from 9 to 6 and stay late on Wednesday and Thursday night, so that was what he told them.
I do not think that the police can just start arresting people on the streets or going through people's garbage at the request of a person, it seems kind of dangerous. So what he should do is wt a few hours, try to catch them during business hours on Friday or Saturday and he should tell them he just wants to talk and that it is about the case. That could help.
I think what he needs to do is just talk to the prosecutor and ask them why the witnesses were intimidated and why the police are intimidating people.
In the police department, the people who give advice to the police also get paychecks from the city. They are kind of like high-ranking bureaucrats. If he can talk to one of them, they should know what is going on, and they might be able to tell him the truth, although they do not have the authority to tell him anything, it seems.
I have a feeling that the police may have arrested him because of his poor reputation and that they are hoping that he will talk to the prosecutor and say something to incriminate him or cause him to confess to some crime. This is just a guess, but I think that the prosecutor is just following his own agenda and he is working with the police department. I would think that it would be a terrible thing for the witnesses and the victim for the prosecutor to have the police say that they were intimidated by the police in the past, or that they were bribed to lie, or to get him to confess to a crime. He has nothing to gn and everything to lose if that happens.
If he just talked to the prosecutor, he might be able to get back on his feet. It is his money that is missing and he has nothing to lose. It might be just a misunderstanding, or a misstep on his part, and that he should look at the evidence carefully and see that it is nothing. He also should not be worried about whether it is a good thing or a bad thing that he has been indicted. It is just what happened and the prosecutor has the power to ask the police department to release him or not to release him. The city pays the police officers, so they are the ones that decide that. If he did have anything to hide, he might hide it and he should not be worried about what the court will think about that.
If you were in his position, and you felt that he was being harassed by the prosecutor, you could hire a good lawyer. It might cost him a lot of money to have a lawyer, but it would be money well spent. It would be worth it to hire a good lawyer, and they would have it in their best interests to let the truth come out. They could even use a good lawyer to protect his reputation as well as his body. That would be good for him.
He might have a choice to say what he needs to say on his own or to hire a good lawyer to talk to the prosecutor, if it was a misunderstanding. He might feel better if he was in a safe situation to talk to the prosecutor and the police. It would be good for him to talk to the prosecutor because then he would know what he has to look forward to in court.
It might be a good idea to talk to the prosecutor and the police because they want to find out what happened so that they can clear their records of this incident. He should not be afrd to talk to them because it is in his best interests to let them know that he had nothing to do with taking his money. He has nothing to hide because of what happened to him.
He should call the police department and talk to a police officer and expln that